Writing into the Day: Alzheimer's Patients

In the book "Nickel and Dimed", Ehrenreich raises the issue regarding the treatment of patients in nursing homes. While working at a nursing home, Ehrenreich serves patients with Alzheimer's disease, and notices that there could be several flaws in her occupation. Ehrenreich realizes that it would not be difficult for a nurse to make a life-threatening mistake that would harm patients with Alzheimer's disease. Ehrenreich even provides information that supports her point of view in the text: "A report issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in July 2000 found most nursing homes dangerously understaffed, especially profit-making nursing homes, such as the one where I worked. Among the consequences of understaffing, according to the report, are increases in preventable problems like severe bedsores, malnutrition, dehydration, congestive heart failure, and infections" (40). Ehrenreich ultimately suggests that there are great risks involved in treating patients at nursing homes. She even suggests that her patients may not have been treated properly by other nurses, because they nurses are typically more concerned about getting paid than the condition of the home/patients.  There are also several reports from other sources  that claim that many other nursing homes do not care for their patients properly either. For instance, there have been some cases in which patients with Alzheimer's Disease have been provided with too much medication. It seems that nurses treat their patients'  outbursts by providing them with more medication, rather than attending to patients' specific needs. In one case, the DeLeon family in California became disturbed when they learned that their relative with Alzheimer's disease was provided with too much medication. This victim's relatives noticed that she was exhibiting odd behavior, even for a patient with Alzheimer's disease. According to her son-in-law, "But they [nurses] just kept giving her more and more...and I noticed when I used to go see her, she'd just kind of mumble, like she was lost" ("Old And Overmedicated: The Real Drug Problem In Nursing Homes"). It personally disturbs me that nurses have been reduced to providing their patients with medication, in order to solve "discomfort". I do not believe that this is a natural process, and firmly believe that nurses should be attending to their patients' needs themselves. People with Alzheimer's Disease may experience mental deterioration, however they are still human beings who deserve respect. Perhaps if the nurses did not rely so much on medication, we would actually be closer to finding a cure to Alzheimer's Disease. However it seems like we are nowhere close to finding a cure, and patients are constantly drugged by nurses, right in front of our eyes. 

Reflection on "Old and Overmedicated: The Real Drug Problem In Nursing Homes"

Reflection: "Old and Overmedicated: The Real Drug Problem in Nursing Homes" 

I personally think that its sad that workers at nursing homes are giving the elderly too many drugs. According to the article "Old and Overmedicate: The Real Drug Problem in Nursing Homes",  nursing facilities are supplying elderly people with too many drugs. Often times, the workers are doing so in order to subdue outbursts. For instance, according to Manuel DeLeon, " "They kept saying she [his elderly mother in law] was making too much noise, and that they give her this medicine to quiet her down." I think that it's sad that nursing homes are reduced to overdosing many patients, although it does relieve pain. I think that an overdosage of drugs might even cause patients to enter  even more of a state of confusion than before. An overdosage of drugs is not natural, and reflects the lack of care that some nurses may exhibit towards patients. Rather than spending time with patients and showing them care, nurses seem to rely entirely on medication to settle their patients outbursts. Perhaps if nursing homes connected with their patients, they would be able to meet their actual needs. 

Reflection on Introduction of "Nickel and Dimed"

1. Do you agree with the parameters she has set for her experiment?

I agree with the parameters that Barbara Ehrenreich has set for her experiment (regarding whether or not a person can live on minimum wage). The rules that Ehrenreich designed for experiment allow her to fully experience the effects of living on minimum wage. She does not have any advantage over those who must make the most with what they have. For instance, the first rule that Ehreinreich creates for herself prevents her from relying on previously learned skills. In her search for jobs, she would refrain from applying for jobs that she was already skilled in, or applying her education to the performance of her jobs. This would put her at the same level as those who were trying to sustain a living, without a high education. Ehreinreich also decided that she would have to perform her job to the best of her ability so she would not risk the chance of losing it. This would also put her on the same basis as those living on a low-income. Lastly, in order to conduct an effective experiment, Ehreinreich decided that she would have to find the cheapest living accommodation. This would allow her to efficiently save money and sustain a living while in poverty. 

2. What potential biases may exist, how does Ehrenreich try to account for these biases—and eliminate them from her study?

Ehrenreich presents the biased opinions that she is superior to other applicants for low-wage jobs, simply because she is educated. Ehrenreich accounts for these biases by verifying that she has an education, but also refuting the argument that she is superior to others. She eliminates the biases from her study, by claiming that her education is not relevant in the low-wage jobs she performs. She also firmly states that low-wage workers are no different from those who are educated. She does not have an advantage over low-wage workers because she does not have experience in the jobs that she applies for. Ehreinreich also claims that low-wage workers share the same feelings as educated workers, and should be treated equally. Overall, Ehrenreich refuses to agree that she is superior to low-wage workers and has an advantage over them, as a result of her education. 

3. What do you think her findings will be? Why?

I think that Barbara Ehreinreich will find that it is not possible for her to put herself in the same position as those forced to live on a low-wage income. In other words, Ehreinreich has an advantage over those forced to live on a low-wage income, and has the option to “cheat”. Ehreinreich is a white female with the ability to speak English and communicate well with others in an American society. Although she may not indicate her intelligence or experience in certain areas to her employees, she already has the advantage of being a white, English speaking citizen. This is a desirable trait for many employees who wish to have their workers to communicate with their buyers. In addition, Ehreinrich has the opportunity to “cheat” if need be. If this author cannot pay for a meal, she has the choice of using her credit card to pay for it. Also, she is picky with her accommodations and has the choice to end the project if she becomes homeless. Those who are truly living on a low-income do not have the option to return to a comfortable life. Therefore, Barbara Ehreinrich would not be truly experiencing the results of living off of a low-income. She would not be forced to make critical decisions, and see if she could survive on her own. Ultimately, the results may not be entirely accurate, if she claims that she was able to survive on a low-salary. 

Writing into the Day: Reflection on Research Project

Writing into the Day: Reflection on Research Project

I think that researching and putting my ideas together have been the most difficult part of this project so far. It wasn't too difficult to choose a topic to research, however the process of dividing my topic into several points and organizing everything was hard. Once I had a rough idea of the subtopics that I wanted to investigate, I had to find reliable information to support my claims. This proved to be difficult, because many sources online were either from blog pages or cites such as "spark notes". Therefore, I had to carefully sort through all the sites that I was given, and find reliable sources with supporting information.

Once I gathered all my research and created an effective outline, everything else fell into place. I was able to write my essay smoothly, and even found that I wanted to focus more on the realistic/ unrealistic views of Huck and Tom, rather than other aspects. I think that I am most proud of how I was able to organize my points efficiently in order to support my thesis.

Although I am proud of how I was able to effectively organize my essay,  I think that I need to review my paper, and make sure that I fully supported all of my claims with rational argumentation. 

Overall, this process has influenced me, because it has made me aware of time management. For future papers, I plan to work more avidly during given class time,.

Research Project

For my research project, I am interested in investigating how Mark Twain critiques unreal romanticism in society. In other words, I will be discussing how Twain discusses the differences between what is real and what is imaginary. I plan to explain how Twain contrasts both Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn and their real/ imaginary ideas. 

Twain does this by: 

-Having Huck go on an adventure, and discovering for himself what is real

-Using Huck to critique Tom's imaginary ideas, and contribute his own possible ideas to the audience

Reflection of "About a Boy and a Raft", and Socratic Seminar Question

2. What are some of the major themes that Twain raises in his novel? Which themes resonate most strongly with you? Why?

Mark Twain illustrates several themes throughout his story, Huckleberry Finn. One theme that resonated with me the most, was the idea of a hypocritical society. Throughout the book, Twain constantly mocked society’s tendency to go against their own morals and beliefs, such as organized religion. For instance, Twain mocks society’s religious values in a church scene with the Grangerfords and Shepherdsons. In this scene, the two neighboring clans sit on opposite sides of the meeting house with guns, while listening to a sermon about “loving thy neighbor”. In regards to this church service, Huck states: The men took their guns along…The Shepherdsons done the same. It was pretty ornery preaching-all about brotherly love. and such-like tiresomeness; but everybody said it was a good sermon, and they all talked it over going home, and had such a powerful lot to say about faith, and good works, and free grace and prefore-ordestination, and I don’t know what all, that it did seem to me to be one of the roughest Sundays I had run across yet” (Twain 76). From this passage it is evident that Twain believes that many religious people are hypocrites, and do not actually take into account the morals of religion. Even after the Grangerfords and Shepherdsons attend a church service about loving their neighbors, they still engage in their family feud. Twain continues to mock society and its moral values, by introducing Aunt Sally to the story. Aunt Sally appears as a sensitive and moral person, yet she has racist views. When Huck tells Aunt Sally that only a black man died during an explosion on a steam boat, Aunt Sally replies by saying, “ Well, it’s lucky; because sometimes people do get hurt (Twain 143). This statement is extremely racist, because Aunt Sally says that it’s “lucky” that a black man died, completely disregarding the fact that this man was a human being too. Therefore, although Aunt Sally appears to be a moral person, and cares for others, she does not embrace people of other races. Overall, society’s hypocrisy is a central theme of Huckleberry Finn, because Twain continuously draws attention to the morals that people neglect. 

Reflection/ Analysis: “About a Boy and a Raft” 

The article “About a Boy and Raft”, by Thomas C. Foster, reviewed the great literary elements and aspects that were included in Huckleberry Finn. While reading Foster’s analysis on Huckleberry Finn, I found that I agreed with Foster’s belief that Tom negatively affected Huck’s development of morals. When Tom was introduced at the end of Huckleberry Finn, Huck easily bends under Tom’s influence. This is frustrating, because before Tom arrived, Huck had made his own decisions during his adventures. He had the opportunity during his journey to decide was was morally acceptable and what was not. For instance, when Huck and jim travel with the Dauphin and the Duke, Huck comes to the conclusion that these two men are frauds. Huck understands that the Dauphin and the Duke are intentionally taking advantage of people and stealing their money. Therefore, Huck has to decide wether he will continue to join the men in their scandal and earn a living, or leave them. Huck ultimately decides that the men are in the wrong, and chooses to escape their influence. Huck also acts as an individual and thinks for himself by agreeing to help Jim escape slavery. Huck understands that he would risk his life by helping Jim, however he decides to anyways. During their travels together, Huck even decides that Jim is similar to him, and sees Jim as his equal. However when Tom arrives, Huck bends under Tom’s command. Huck agrees to Tom’s suggestions on helping Jim escape, and does not try to enforce his own logical ideas. This is rather rather frustrating for the readers because Huck has been on a journey in which he has shown the ability to decide what is right for himself, yet he agrees to tom’s complicated and illogical ideas. Overall, I would agree with Foster that the introduction of Tom was one of the most frustrating components of Huckleberry Finn. 

Journal Entry #3, Question 2

Analyze the conflict between the Shepherdsons and the Grangerfords. Why does Twain include these families in his novel?

During chapters 17 and 19 of Huckleberry Finn, we are introduced to the Grangerfords and the Shepherdsons. These wealthy, aristocratic families have engaged in a family feud for over 30 years, and continue to fight for no reason other than to continue the feud. Neither families seem to understand why they are fighting; they simply continue to kill each other and seek revenge for an unknown event of the past. When Huck asks Buck why the two families are engaged in a feud, Buck does not have a clear explanation as to why: “Oh, yes, pa knows, I reckon, and some of the other older folks; but they don’t know now what the row was about in the first place” (Twain 75).  Although the families do not understand why they are fighting, they continue to fight for the sake of it. 

Twain may have included the dispute of the Grangerfords and Shepherdsons in Huckleberry Finn in order to allude to the Civil War. By describing two feuding groups who do not entirely understand what they are fighting for, Twain could possibly be alluding to the conflict between the North and the South. During the Civil War, the North and South disagreed over several issues such as slavery, and fought as a result of sectionalism that grew over the years. However, some of the younger men who were drafted for the Civil War may not have entirely understood what they were fighting for or what past issues led to the division between the North and the South. Older adults may have understood the conflict, like the older members of the Grangerford and Shepherdsons apparently remembered why the two families were engaging in fighting. But Twain may have thought that the younger generation who fought in the Civil War did not entirely understand what issues led to the war and fought only for the sake of fighting. Perhaps this is what he was trying to convey in his book by creating a feud between opposing sides, within the same area, that generally did not understand the purpose for fighting. In other words, Twain may have seen the Civil War as a ridiculous event, and alluded to it in his story.